找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Back to Sociological Theory; The Construction of Nicos P. Mouzelis Book 1991 Nicos P. Mouzelis 1991 capital.Hierarchie.Institution.Integra

[复制链接]
查看: 29854|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 17:02:28 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Back to Sociological Theory
期刊简称The Construction of
影响因子2023Nicos P. Mouzelis
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Back to Sociological Theory; The Construction of  Nicos P. Mouzelis Book 1991 Nicos P. Mouzelis 1991 capital.Hierarchie.Institution.Integra
影响因子Nicos Mouzelis argues against a marked tendency in present- day sociology to conflate philosophy and sociological theory. In trying to demonstrate the relative autonomy and specific logic of sociological theorising, he draws from a variety of theoretical traditions in order to construct a set of interrelated concepts useful for bridging the gulf between macro and micro sociologies. Drawing examples from the sociology of development and from the theory of organisations, the author shows concretely how the conceptual framework proposed can help the researcher to avoid both the reification of macro institutional structures and their reduction to the intersubjective understandings of micro actors.
Pindex Book 1991
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Back to Sociological Theory影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Back to Sociological Theory影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Back to Sociological Theory网络公开度




书目名称Back to Sociological Theory网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Back to Sociological Theory被引频次




书目名称Back to Sociological Theory被引频次学科排名




书目名称Back to Sociological Theory年度引用




书目名称Back to Sociological Theory年度引用学科排名




书目名称Back to Sociological Theory读者反馈




书目名称Back to Sociological Theory读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:39:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:18:06 | 显示全部楼层
Shawna Hopper MSc,Theodore D. Cosco PhDl as pull together the various threads of the argument, and show in more systematic manner the connections between social hierarchies, the concepts of social- and system-integration, and those of duality and dualism on the syntagmatic and paradigmatic levels.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:14:50 | 显示全部楼层
Jennifer L. Robitaille,Jack A. Naglieri ., has not so much to do with relations between more and less encompassing social systems as with relations between economic and non-economic institutional orders, mainly on the macro-level of analysis.
发表于 2025-3-22 11:56:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:16:52 | 显示全部楼层
Sam Goldstein,Richard Rider,Alex Velezerms of the respective difference between ‘social interaction where others are present and social interaction with others who are absent’.) has not been very successful. This is hardly surprising, since identifying micro with ‘presence-availability’ in social interaction is not only unhelpful but downright misleading.
发表于 2025-3-22 20:05:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:32:12 | 显示全部楼层
Handbook of Research on Teacher Educationhat has succeeded the introverted, sociology-centred theory of the early 1950s and 1960s has not managed to provide any systematically useful concepts for sociologists interested in theoretically-oriented empirical work.
发表于 2025-3-23 01:50:50 | 显示全部楼层
Restructuring Structuration Theory: Duality and Dualism in Sociological Theory,hat has succeeded the introverted, sociology-centred theory of the early 1950s and 1960s has not managed to provide any systematically useful concepts for sociologists interested in theoretically-oriented empirical work.
发表于 2025-3-23 05:55:01 | 显示全部楼层
Rita Z. Nazeer-Ikeda,S. Gopinathans on these two dichotomies (material/ideal, real/nominal), the authors of . construct a four-fold typology that enables them to discuss systematically and in a theoretically rigorous fashion four major strategies of sociological theorising: those of empiricism, subjectivism, substantialism and rationalism.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-9 18:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表